In a clear indication that only the single woman domain investor, goa 1989 jee topper is being targetted for the most horrific human rights abuses since 2010, without a legally valid reason, is that the government agencies do not subject other domain investors in india for MEMORY ROBBERY, stealing trade secrets, denying the citizen privacy, though they own far more domains.
For example hyderabad investor swetha venugala she has 16000 domains, the government agencies do not steal her memory, put her under surveillance the goa 1989 jee topper is only an experienced engineer, has only approximately 500 domains, yet in a clear case of discrimination, human rights abuses, the indian and state government agencies especially in panaji, goa are falsely claiming that domain ownership makes her a security threat to ROB her memory since 2010, without a legally valid reason.
When the hyderabad security agencies do not falsely label swetha yenugala a security threat despite owning 16000 domains, why is the goa government, its corrupt greedy liar security agency employees like caro,nayak,mandrekar,pritesh chodankar,naik, falsely labelling the goa 1989 jee topper a security threat without any other kind of proof,to ROB her memory, correspondence, subject her to the most horrific human rights abuses since 2012

Some citizens do not have servants in their home, not because they do not want to pay, but because having a servant will affect the privacy of the person.
Though most people do not realize it, the servant spending 30 minutes to one hour in the house for a few months can get a lot of information about the family, members, appliances and other items in the house and who is coming and going.
It is also advisable to supervise the maidservant while she is doing the work, so that no item is displaced.
So if no family member has time to supervise the maidservant, it is better not to have a maidservant.
The domain investor does not have a maidservant mainly because her privacy is affected, yet the government is ruthless in its human rights abuses on a private citizen, denying her privacy her fundamental right, for 11 years using MEMORY ROBBERY without a legally valid reason